The 1988 INALCO notation
Lesson 1 of 4≈ 12 min
Reading the heritage
A large part of written Comorian literature — tales, poems, song transcriptions, early textbooks — was published before 2009 and uses a different spelling: the INALCO 1988 notation, developed by Ahmed-Chamanga, Lafon and Sibertin-Blanc.
To access this heritage, you need to mentally convert this older notation into the modern 2019 norm. That's what this module teaches.
Good news: 3 main differences cover most of it. Lesson 6.2 adds the rarer gaps (np, npb, tsh, apostrophe).
1988 vs 2019 notation — overview
| Aspect | 1988 notation | 2019 notation |
|---|---|---|
| Implosives ɓ and ɗ | « b » and « d » not distinguished | ɓ and ɗ (dedicated letters) |
| Nasal vowels | non-systematic circumflex | â, ê, î, ô, û (full letters) |
| Pre-nasal 'goat' | nbuzi | mɓuzi (strong b, Ng) or mbuzi (weak b, Nz) |
| Vowel onset | apostrophe (ra'isi, kur'ani) | dieresis (suäla); the apostrophe now only marks elision (n'emwana) |
Difference #1 — no explicit implosives
The most important difference. The 1988 notation was designed to be typed on any typewriter — so no special characters like ɓ or ɗ.
Consequence: the « b » of 1988 represents two different sounds:
- The *weak b = standard b (loanwords: biro, dipe*)
- The *strong b = implosive ɓ (native words: baba = ɓaɓa, banga* = ɓanga)
Same for « d »: daho = ɗaho, dago = ɗago.
The reader had to guess from context and root. That's why learning 1988 already required knowing the implosives aurally.
The 2019 norm solved this by introducing dedicated letters ɓ and ɗ.
Difference #2 — no systematic nasal vowels
In 1988, nasal vowels (today's â, ê, î, ô, û) were marked inconsistently — sometimes with a circumflex, sometimes not. The word âda (« custom », Arabic origin) could be written:
- âda (with circumflex)
- ada (without)
- aada (with doubled vowel)
Depending on the author and era. In 2019, â is a full letter: always âda, full stop.
Difference #3 — the « nb » pre-nasal
In 1988, we wrote nbuzi (goat) — with initial nb. In 2019, the nasal is written m before a b (consistent with its bilabial nature).
But the 1988 nb stands for two sounds: the 1988 article states that nbuzi has a « strong » b in shingazidja and a « weak » b in shindzuani. The 2019 norm tells them apart:
- strong b → mɓ: mɓuzi (shingazidja)
- weak b → mb: mbuzi (shindzuani, as Ahmed-Chamanga writes it, 1992, p. 20)
To convert an nb, you therefore need to know which dialect the text comes from, and to know the word.
1988 → 2019 examples
Some emblematic words:
- banga (1988) → ɓanga (2019) — hut
- baba (1988) → ɓaɓa (2019) — dad
- daho (1988) → ɗaho (2019) — house (Ng?, to be confirmed)
- dago (1988) → ɗago (2019) — house (Nz, Ma)
- nbuzi (1988) → mɓuzi (Ng) or mbuzi (Nz) (2019) — goat
- taâbu (1988) → taâbu (2019) — problem (spelling stays, but â is now a letter)
Mechanical conversion requires knowing which 1988 « b »s and « d »s are implosive. For that, you need word etymology or a reference lexicon.
Practice
Convert banga (1988) into 2019 notation.
1988 spellingbangaConvert nbuzi (1988, shingazidja) into 2019 notation.
1988 spellingnbuzi
Mini-quiz
Why didn't the 1988 notation have ɓ and ɗ?
To be typable on a ___.
Conversion rules in detail
Lesson 6.2 systematises these differences in an explicit conversion table. You'll have everything you need to transcribe a 1988 text in minutes.
